Saturday, April 28, 2012

How I'm Deviant: The Labels of My Life


Dressed in a green and white  hand-me-down onesie with football numbers on the back, people gathered around and swooned over the new baby. “Oh, he’s so handsome,” they’d say to the young parents, to my parents. My parents would politely thank them and casually mention that this handsome young man was actually a young girl -- she was me, and this was just the beginning.

Master Status: Female
Click For Picture Source


Since the day I was born, I have been thrown into categories that are marked as not normal, or deviant.  Deviance, as a broad term, according to Howard Becker in his article Outsiders: Defining Deviance, is considered to be, “anything that varies too widely from the average.”  It started with little things, such as wearing my brothers old clothes that made me look less feminine than the other female babies that were drowning in pink frills.  My gender was always questioned by outsiders based on my appearance, and being bald till I was two didn’t necessarily scream “female” to those on-lookers either. Comments about my parents purposely “making” me more masculine were thrown around, and many people disagreed with the way my parents chose to dress me.  Even when I wasn’t in boys clothes, which really wasn’t even that often, I still looked like a hairless baby boy.  After putting up with everyone’s scrutiny, my parents finally decided to get my ears pierced after I turned two, so people would quit questioning my gender.  Ears pierced and wearing dresses; you’d assume that my supposed deviance would wither away because I finally fit societies’ gender expectations, but that quickly escaped me as I became older.

Master Status: Tomboy
Click For Picture Source


Growing up, males were more prominent in my life, rather than females. I was constantly around my dad, brothers, uncles, and male cousins, so naturally, for me anyways, what I learned to be an “appropriate” way for me to act, differed from what society expected from me. I had such a strong male upbringing as a child, and my actions and attitude definitely reflected that. I was taught to be tough; our motto was “no bones, no blood, no problem,” when it came to getting hurt.  When it came to sticking to my own gender roles and acting like society expected me to, I did the complete opposite. As a female, I was expected to be dainty, clean, sweet, and innocent, but I did not portray those societal valued attributes. When society was telling me to play with Barbies, be a cheerleader, and have fancy tea parties, I was doing what my brothers did; playing football, riding cars, and my favorite, playing in the dirt.   Becker  also states that, “Deviance is created by the responses of people to particular kinds of behavior, by the labeling of that behavior as deviant,” and the responses I were receiving were not positive.  I was often times encouraged to stray away from these behaviors that were considered not appropriate for my gender, but I learned these behaviors by association with the males that were present in my life and didn’t felt the need to change them to match societies’ standards.
According to Sutherland and Cresseys’ Differential Association Theory, also known as Social Learning Theory states that, “Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication” (Cressey 27).  Although doing boyish things was not a crime, it was still looked upon as a deviant act due to the influences around me. To me, I didn’t really know, at that age, that the way I was acting was considered deviant or wrong, it was what I learned from watching those around me.  My tomboy persona was just how I was raised and what I was used to. What was deviant to society was normal to me.

Master Status: Slut

Click For Picture Source


Entering into middle school, I still spent most of my time being “one of the guys.” I was still into sports, still didn’t dress super girly, and still felt comfortable in who I was, but that changed rapidly.  I went from being the cool girl who could play sports with all of the boys at recess in elementary school, to the girl who basically only had male friends, which quickly left me with the stigma and label of being a “slut.” I was young and never even kissed a boy, but here I was, being called crude names and was harshly judged just because of the people I hung out with. I would constantly get people coming up to me telling me that I needed to hang out with different people, that my friends of choice were “wrong,” because they weren’t the same gender as myself.  The constant nag of these people reminded me of what John Braithwaite says about the shaming theory.  
According to John Braithwaite, “Shaming means all social process of expressing disapproval which have the intention or effect of invoking remorse in the person being shamed and/or condemnation  by others who become away of the shaming.”  He then goes on to say it, “Sets out to moralize with the offender to communicate reasons for the evil of her actions” (Braithwaite 34).  This statement is portrays exactly what was going on at the time; I either needed to change my, oh so deviant ways of hanging out with boys, or else I was considered having evil actions and was a slut.  Although, when a boy hangs out with solely the opposite sex, they’re label can go two ways; they are either labeled as a ladies’ man, or as being gay, but if a girl does the same, they are instantly labeled things that hold negative connotations, like I was.  Society holds different genders to different expectations and standards.  What is deviant for one, is praised for another.  It wasn’t until high school that people realized that how I was brought up had a lot of influence on who I chose to hang out with, and how I chose to act, that I wasn’t just some incorrect label they had placed on me.  
           

Master Status: Overacheiver
Click For Picture Source


During my second year of high school, my brother passed away in a motorcycle accident, and it completely changed the way I acted as well as the way people viewed me.  I was no longer attacked for who I hung out with, I suddenly became viewed as fragile and everybody was walking on eggshells around me.  People treated me, almost as if I couldn’t take care of myself.  It reminded me of Mark Zupan’s movie, Murderball, where people were trying to help him do things that he did on a daily basis, when he could actually do them himself.  In this case, I wasn’t in a wheelchair like he is, but people were still acting like I wasn’t capable of doing what I always do. 
I used this time to focus on myself, my schooling, and my faith.  When everybody was expecting me to break down and be fragile, I pushed myself even further. I did anything I could to keep my mind off things.  I got very involved in a youth group, volunteering, and worked very hard to keep up my academics.  Once this started, it was what everybody, mainly my parents, kept expecting from me.  Becker’s labeling theory suggests that, “It sets in motion several mechanisms which conspire to shape the person in the image people have of him” (Becker 41), which is what I saw happening.  I was labeled as this overachieving individual, who had overcome many hardships, and the more this label was placed on me, the more I started believing it and wanting to conform to it. I found myself starting to embrace the labels I was given at this point.


Master Status: Fat vs. Thick


            Throughout my childhood, I have always been more on the heavy side, and it was always viewed as a negative thing up until recently.  To the majority of society, being fat is not an ideal of beauty.  In the article,  3 Strikes Against Curvy Women , it states, “ Yet another new study hammers home the reality that tall, thin women (bonus for weensy waists and long arms) are rated most attractive,” and I did not fit into that most attractive category.  Up until high school, I was considered to be fluffy, chunky, plump, and any other word that was supposed to kindly say “fat.”  Once I hit high school, this new term came about; “thick.”  To me, this term seems just as silly as those other “safe” words to call somebody fat, but to society it is became valued and entailed positive meanings. Girls with curves that are appealing to men, hold a sense of beauty and sex appeal, not being either fat or skinny, but thick.  As I toned my body more throughout school, I was often called “thick” rather than overweight, because it held a more positive connotation, it was considered to be a compliment.  As long as I had a big bust and big butt, being chubby was okay, but if I had a big stomach, then the positive thick label would go away.   


Master Status: Modified (Good vs. Bad)



             As I’ve gotten older, I have found more ways to outwardly define myself, other than labels that I have gathered throughout the years from society and my peers.  These definitions of character that I have mustered up have gone against societal norms as well.  Since a young age, I have been interested a lot in body modifications, mainly tattoos and piercings, and have began to get them myself.  With such a strong Christian background, this has been considered extremely deviant in the setting and culture of the church, because being heavily pierced or having visible tattoos holds numerous negative assumptions and connotations.  In the article  Body Art, Deviance, and American College Students , a study conducted showed that people with a great amount of tattoos or piercings were “substantively and significantly” more likely to use marijuana regularly, use other illegal drugs, be arrest for crime, cheat on college work, drink, and have multiple sex partners.  I feel like most of society feels like this is true for the majority of modified people, that just because they’re modified, they’re automatically lesser of a person or involved in criminal behavior.
            On the first day of class, we did an exercise where we had to examine the person next to us and answer specific questions without communicating, and my partner was surprised to later find out that I was involved a lot with my church because my outward appearance told her otherwise.  For me, this reassured the negative stereotype that belongs to these deviant body declarations; that they’re associated negatively with the person that posses them.  It is interesting for me to see how things that are so taboo here, are culture in other parts of the world, such as the Mekranoti Tribe, Kayapo, where they embrace modifications as a tradition.
            Another thing that is interesting to me is that within the negative stereotypes of having body modifications, there are also ranges of acceptance. With piercings, nipple and genital piercings are considered more deviant than others, which the article  Body Art, Deviance, and American College Students  also suggests.  If somebody has their ears stretched, that’s okay, but not too big or it’s considered gross.  Something that relates to me the most is that the meaning behind tattoos change the level of deviance attached on to them.  All of my tattoos have either personal meaning or religious affiliation behind them, and are more accepted than someone who is tattooed with something considered random or something that was done at the spur of the moment.  Within each and every stereotype, society also holds a view of what can be justified within a given label, while others still remain more deviant.

Master Status: Student
Click For Picture Source

           
            In this social deviance course, I have learned a lot about what it means to be deviant and how it is constructed by the way society molds beliefs and values pertaining to certain things.  Master statuses are fluid with many factors, provided by society, that can expose them to change.  They are put into place so that when society sees you, they can make a quick judgment on how they relate to you, just like the exercise on the first day of class showed. As I’ve grown up, I’ve gone through many different master statuses, whether they be associated with the way I look, the way I act, or the types of people I surround myself with.  I’ve learned things about myself that I hadn’t realized before I took this course, and with each different situation I experience, I am exposed to new things that can alter my master status, in both negative and positive ways.


Word Count: 2,129


References:

Becker, Howard S. "Labeling Theory." Readings In Deviant Behavior. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. 20120. 39-41.

Cressey, Donald R., and Edwin H. Sutherland. "Differential Association Theory." Readings In Deviant Behavior. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. 2010.  27-29.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Live Nude Girls Unite! Film Review

Live Nude Girls Unite! is a documentary following Julia Query, a peep-show stripper/stand-up comedian/daughter of a feminist activist, and her co workers, focusing on the struggles strippers face and their fight for their rights as workers.  Certain rights, such as, sick days and basic safety precautions/protection from the business owners, are usually automatically granted to people who hold a position in a job, but since being a stripper is not looked upon as being a “real” job, unfortunately, they do not have the same rights.  This documentary follows the women of Lusty Lady Theater in San Francisco, as they make the successful efforts in unionizing and demanding these basic rights from the owners.  The thesis of this film shows that these women, as strippers, are also still human beings, mothers, daughters, and sisters that deserve the same rights any other job would offer.
The main arguments supporting this thesis are shown throughout the entire movie, coming from the determined workers to fight for their rights and equality, eventually going on strike to prove their determination and hard efforts.  Acts of discrimination against the women based on their race, body size, breast size, age, and even hair color were/are issues that arise within the sex industry, and this documentary shows the women fighting for equality for all women. Although they were not given exactly what they were asking for, their hard work still paid off, successfully leading to the first unionized strip club, which had a rippling effect, leading other women to seek our assistance in fighting for their rights as well.
This film relates to the course in a few ways, including inequality with gender, class, race, and most apparent, the stigma revolving someone who is considered deviant in society. To society, individuals who are involved in sex work are not positively acknowledged or given help in regards to their rights, because they are considered to be less than human, when in reality, they are people too, just like you and me.  Those who are labeled deviant to society don’t receive the same privileges as those who are considered an “ideal” individual to society, and they have to work much harder to receive those same privileges.
There was only one part of this documentary that was least convincing for me, and that was how Julia was so open about fighting for her rights and making it a point to show people that she deserves equality, but was too scared to tell her mom about what she truly does for a living.  It bothered me knowing that was she was fighting for, she also felt shameful for in some regards.  Other than that, I found this documentary to be very convincing, and although I never looked down upon individuals involved in the sex industry, it opened my eyes to what they actually go through, and gave me a new respect for those who are involved in that type of work.
One point that stood out to me was how diverse each person’s background was; some were parents, some had college degrees, while some didn’t. If I were to conduct a study around this, I would like to learn about each individual’s background, and why they decided to get involved in sex work.  I feel like a lot of society believes that strippers have some previous emotional scarring, or intense duty to provide for a family, and have no other choice but to get involved in sex work. I’d like to see how many workers enjoy their job, their background, and their reasoning being working there to see if it differs from societies preconceived assumptions.